| BASIC COURSE INFORMATION | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cover Page | |||||||||||||
| Department/ Subject Area | ENG | ||||||||||||
| Course Number | 001D | ||||||||||||
| Disciplines |
ENG-English |
||||||||||||
| Proposal Type | Course Revision (Major) | ||||||||||||
| Division | Library, Learning Resources, and Language Arts Division | ||||||||||||
| Cross Listing Courses | |||||||||||||
| Course Title | Evaluative Reading and Critical Composition | ||||||||||||
| Transcript Title | Critical Composition | ||||||||||||
| Course Description | This course is designed for the student who wishes to transfer to a four-year college or university. The course emphasizes the development of critical thinking skills through instruction in essay writing by focusing on the principles of logic and developing the abilities to analyze, to criticize, and to reach reasoned conclusions. Critical thinking is refined by close reading of prose to distinguish fact from value judgment and knowledge from opinion. The student is required to write between 6500 and 8000 words divided among several essay assignments. (UC, CSU) | ||||||||||||
| Community Service | No | ||||||||||||
| Proposed For |
Revision |
||||||||||||
| Effective Date | 2010 Fall | ||||||||||||
| Change | MINOR | ||||||||||||
| How Course is being Changed |
Comparable courses updated. Requesting course be submitted for new CSU GE. Requesting course be submitted for new IGETC. Student learning outcomes and assessment updated. Sample assignments updated. Instructor lecture units increased. Outline revised (less than 20%). Methods of evaluation updated. Course objectives revised (less than 20%). Course goals revised (less than 20%). |
||||||||||||
| Change Text | Title changed from Critical Composition to Evaluative Reading and Critical Composition. Student and faculty lecture hours/units incresed from 3 to 4. Reading component expanded, essay strategies expanded, research/documentation component expanded. | ||||||||||||
| Course Description | |||||||||||||
| Lecture Hrs: | 4.00 - 4.00 | ||||||||||||
| Lab Hrs: | 0 - 0 | ||||||||||||
| Student Unit Hrs: | 4.00 - 4.00 | ||||||||||||
| Faculty Lecture Units: | 4.00 | ||||||||||||
| Faculty Lab Units: | 0 | ||||||||||||
| Field Trips | Not Required | ||||||||||||
| Grade Options | 0: A-F or Inc. | ||||||||||||
| Transfer/Degree Applicability | Transfer Degree Applicability | ||||||||||||
| Non-Credit Options |
|
||||||||||||
| Repeated | NO | ||||||||||||
| Repeat Count | |||||||||||||
| Repeat Frequency | |||||||||||||
| Repeat Period | |||||||||||||
| Repeat Units | |||||||||||||
| Repeat Rationale | |||||||||||||
| Challenged | YES | ||||||||||||
| Rationale | Because the general goals of English 1D constitute a complex of reading and writing skills, a challenge examination measuring those skills is a reasonable instrument to assess whether or not a student can demonstrate mastery of them. | ||||||||||||
| Fee Amount | 0.00 | ||||||||||||
| Comparable Course Information | |||||||||||||
| Comparable Course Information |
Community College Course Mira Costa College Critical Thinking and Composition ENGL 202 Catalog Year: 2009/10 Page: 175 URL: http://www.miracosta.cc.ca.us/OfficeOfThePresident/PIO/Publications/catalog.pdf Critical Thinking and Composition 4 Units Prerequisite: ENGL 100 with a grade of āCā or better. Acceptable for Credit: CSU, UC Lecture 4 hours. (1501.00) This course emphasizes critical thinking, particularly in the reading and writing of argument. Content includes methods of analysis; principles of logic, including the relationship between language and logic; techniques of reasoning, including the use of evidence; techniques of style; and research skills. English 1D also emphasizes critical thinking in the reading and writing of argument. CSU CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY - MONTEREY Reasoning & Communication HCOM 212 Catalog Year: 2009-2011 Page: online URL: http://schedule.csumb.edu/classes/HCOM/descriptions/ HCOM 212: Reasoning & Communication Units 4 Units Effective Aug 1, 2010 View History Description: Introduction to practical reasoning and argumentation. Students develop empathic and critical listening, reading, writing, and speaking skills for cooperative deliberation and problem solving practices. They anticipate and assess various perspectives, alternatives, and their consequences for all who are affected by the decision-making process. (Offered every semester.) Prerequisites, Corequisites, and Registration Restrictions: (Prerequisites: EngCom A) UC UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA - RIVERSIDE Applied Intermediate Composition (4) ENGL 001C Catalog Year: 2008-2009 Page: online 246 URL: http://www.catalog.ucr.edu/catalog2008/English.pdf Lecture, 3 hours; extra writing and rewriting, 3 hours. Prerequisite(s): ENGL 001B. Addresses the function of writing in a range of contemporary situations, including that of the academy, from a critical and theoretical perspective. Students must be formally enrolled prior to the beginning of instruction and must attend the first day to avoid being dropped from the class. Credit is awarded for only one of ENGL 001C,ENGL 01HC, or ENGL 01SC. |
||||||||||||
| Course Goals | |||||||||||||
| Course Goals |
General Goals: Upon successful completion of this course, the student will be able to: 1. Read and evaluate college level material on contemporary issues from a variety of sources. 2. Invent original questions of inquiry based upon college-level reading material. 3. Adapt prewriting, drafting, and revising strategies to the specific purpose of a documented essay. 4. Compose documented essays written in Standard Written English supporting original thesis propositions. |
||||||||||||
| Course Objectives | |||||||||||||
| Course Objectives |
Specific Objectives: Upon successful completion of this course, the student will be able to: 1. Summarize and paraphrase college level readings in order to derive supporting citations. 2. Distinguish between descriptive and factual supporting material and evaluative supporting material. 3. Assess the value of sources for use in supporting the writer's original, invented proposition. 4. Employ the stages of the writing process in service of an original thesis, including prethinking and prewriting, identifying purpose and audience, formulating an argumentative thesis, selecting and arranging source material, composing a rough draft, and revising for content and mechanics. 5. Recognize and select appropriate logical critical thinking patterns in the composition of written definition, causal analysis, evaluation, refutation, and argument. 6. Master MLA/APA formats in the synthesis and citation of sources in documented essays. |
||||||||||||
| Course Outcomes | |||||||||||||
| Course Outcomes |
|
||||||||||||
| Course Outline | |||||||||||||
| Outline Text |
I. Elements of Critical Thinking a. Investigating a problem b. Establishing point of view/frame of reference c. Identifying assumptions d. Defining conceptual and empirical dimensions e. Formulating inferences and conclusions f. Controlling purpose g. Avoiding logical fallacies II. Elements of Evaluative Reading a. Identifying premises and conclusions b. Distinguishing among facts, concepts, and judgments c. Detecting inductive and deductive arguments d. Recognizing cultural assumptions e. Making inferences f. Distinguishing denotative and connotative language g. Evaluating diction and tone h. Recognizing humor, satire, irony, paradox, and analogy III. Elements of Prewriting a. Composing a question of inquiry b. Formulating a thesis c. Collecting, assessing, and arranging source material d. Selecting an organizational pattern e. Identifying an audience f. Employing prewriting strategies IV. Elements of Composition a. Executing a precis/planning sheet/outline b. Conceptualizing the rough draft c. Synthesizing original thought with source material d. Composing the rough draft V. Elements of Revision a. Partnering with an editor b. Revising the rough draft for substantive changes c. Revising the rough draft for Standard Written English grammar and mechanics d. Revising the rough draft for appropriate scholarly attribution of sources
|
||||||||||||
| Course Assignments | |||||||||||||
| Course Assignments |
Reading Optional Text: Assignments: Thorstein Veblen's Pecuniary Emulation Journal Assignment: Select one of Veblen's conceptual assertions from "Pecuniary Emulation." Introduce the quotation by explaining how it supports Veblen's thesis. Quote the assertion with MLA formatting. Then translate what Veblen is saying by putting his complex, dated diction into your own language. Provide a contemporary illustration to illustrate Veblen's concept. Conclude by arguing whether or not, in your own life and your observations, you find Veblen's point to be convincing.
Writing Optional Text: Assignments: Documented Essay Assignment: In their autobiographical essays concerning white-on-black prejudice, Brent Staples and Jesus Colon reach different conclusions about how a stereotyped ethnicity might cope with prejudicial perceptions. In "Night Walker," Staples tells us that he'll continue to do his best to defuse the fear he inspires on the street by whistling classical music and thus signaling his innocence. He implicitly argues that he can adopt this preventative stereotype-breaking behavior without diminishing his own pride and integrity. In "Memorial Day," however, Colon decides that he will refuse to submit to the stereotyped perceptions of white Americans; he will never again hesitate to help a needy person for fear of being repulsed because doing so would diminish his personal and cultural morality. Neither man addresses, however, what the prejudicial person might do in order to alleviate the dehumanizing effects of the practice of prejudice. Put yourself in the position of the women whom Staples has unintentionally frightened and whom Colon has encountered. Determine whether the avoidance behavior exhibited by these women doing the stereotyping constitutes blatant, unthinking prejudice or defensible and valid cautionary action. Decide which of the following thesis statements you want to support, and extend the sentence to include your reasoning supporting your stand in an essay documented with the thoughts of Staples and Colon.
Other Optional Text: Assignments: Real World Application: After instruction in fallacies of reasoning, the student will identify a minimum of 10 fallacies in real-world applications, such as newspapers, magazines, advertisements, billboards, letters to the editor, op ed pieces, political speeches, etc.
|
||||||||||||
| Course Methods of Evaluation | |||||||||||||
| Opt Heading | |||||||||||||
| Course Methods of Evaluation | A student's evaluation will be based on a required final examination and multiple measures of performance including critical thinking. These methods may include, but are not limited to the following. College-level reading, critical thinking, and writing skills demonstrated in prewriting activities, journal entries, writing exercises, group discussions and presentations, formal essays, quizzes, written examinations, and a required final examination essay. |
||||||||||||
| Course Methods of Instruction | |||||||||||||
| Opt Heading | |||||||||||||
| Methods |
Dist Ed-Other Internet-Delayed Inter Lecture |
||||||||||||
| Other Methods | |||||||||||||
| Course Distance Education | |||||||||||||
| Delivery Methods |
Chat Room Online Discussions Online Forum Online Lectures Private Messaging Telephone Threaded Discussions |
||||||||||||
| Other Methods | |||||||||||||
| Quality Assurance | English 1D Online, Critical Composition, is comparable to on-campus sections in the depth of its exploration of critical thinking and in the rigor of the course requirements. The writing content is comparable to (and often greater than) that required by on-campus sections. The word count achieved by students in online sections is approximately 11,000 words because discussion takes place on the screen in threaded discussion. The online course will require equal or great student contact hours as on-campus sections. | ||||||||||||
| Evaluation Method | Students are evaluated on demonstration of their mastery of course concepts with written work in threaded discussions, journals, and formal essays. A final examination requires students to demonstrate reading comprehension, synthesis, and composition skills in the composition of a formal essay employing MLA documentation. | ||||||||||||
| Additional Resources | |||||||||||||
| Distance Ed - Contact Types | |||||||||||||
| Distance Ed - Contact Types |
Online Lectures - Weekly Telephone - As necessary Threaded Discussions - Weekly Chat Room - At instructor's discretion Online Forum - Weekly Email - In a timely manner to respond to student inquiries and to evaluate student work Online Discussions - Weekly Private Messaging - As necessary to answer student questions and to respond to student work |
||||||||||||
| Course Textbooks | |||||||||||||
| Textbooks |
Vincent Ryan Ruggiero. Beyond Feelings: A Guide to Critical Thinking. Eighth or current edition McGraw Hill , 2008 Vincent Ryan Ruggiero. The Art of Thinking: A Guide to Critical and Creative Thought. Eighth or current edition Pearson , 2007 Sylvan Barnet and Hugo Bedau. Current Issues and Enduring Questions. Eighth or current edition Bedford/St. Martin's , 2007 Dorothy U. Seyler. Read, Reason, Write. Eighth or current edition McGraw-Hill College , 2008 |
||||||||||||
| Manuals |
Anna Villegas, editor. English 1D Handbook. Delta College Bookstore |
||||||||||||
| Periodicals | |||||||||||||
| Course Supplies | |||||||||||||
| Course Supplies | |||||||||||||
| Course Resources | |||||||||||||
| Course Resources |
Learning Resources Optional Text: Current support adequate Resources: Computer Resources Optional Text: Current support adequate Resources: Disabled Student Programs and Services Optional Text: Current support adequate Resources: Other Resources Optional Text: Current support adequate Resources: |
||||||||||||
| Entry Skills | |||||||||||||
| Entry Skills |
Prerequisite - ENG 1A Exit Competencies from Requisite Course Eng 1A |
||||||||||||
| Course Requisites | |||||||||||||
| Course Requisites |
Requisite Type: Catalog Prerequisites Sub Area Course #: ENG-001A With a Minimum Grade of C Comment: |
||||||||||||
| General Education Requirements | |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
| Transfer Types |
IGETC UC Transfer course agreement Course can be transferred to CSU Course can be transferred to UC |
||||||||||||
| Course Codes | |||||||||||||
| CB00 State ID | CCC000368017 |
||||||||||||
| SAM Code (CB09) |
E = Not Occupational |
||||||||||||
| TOP Code (CB03) | 1501.00 - English | ||||||||||||
| Course Credit Status (CB04) | |
||||||||||||
| Coop Educational Code |
N - N = Not Coop Education |
||||||||||||
| Coop Work Code (CB10) |
Y - Y = Not Applicable |
||||||||||||
| CAN Code (CB14) | |||||||||||||
| Course Completion Assessment Level | None | ||||||||||||
| Instructional Code |
M - Intermediate |
||||||||||||
| Classification Codes (CB11) | A - Liberal Arts | ||||||||||||
| Print Catalog | YES | ||||||||||||
| Print Class Schedule | YES | ||||||||||||
| Independent Studies | NO | ||||||||||||
| Open Entry | NO | ||||||||||||
| Work Experience | NO | ||||||||||||
| Special Topics | NO | ||||||||||||
| Appointment | YES | ||||||||||||
| Contract Course | NO | ||||||||||||
| Basic Skills (CB08) | N Not Basic Skills | ||||||||||||
| Organizational Unit | Library, Learning Resources, & Language Arts Div | ||||||||||||
| Prior Skills (CB21) | Y = Not applicable | ||||||||||||
| Originator | Paula Sheil | ||||||||||||
| Previous Course | ENG 001D Critical Composition | ||||||||||||
| Proposal Type | Course Revision (Major) | ||||||||||||
| Course Status | Launched | ||||||||||||
| Admin Dates | |||||||||||||
| Discipline Group Chair | 08/12/2009 | ||||||||||||
| Curriculum Committee Chair | 08/12/2009 | ||||||||||||